The University of Adelaide The University of Adelaide Australia
You are here: 
text zoom : S | M | L
Printer Friendly Version
Further Enquiries

School of Mechanical Engineering
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
SA 5005
AUSTRALIA
Email

Telephone: +61 8 8303 5460
Facsimile: +61 8 8303 4367

Publications

A comparison of filter design structures for multi-channel acoustic communication systems

A comparison of filter design structures for multi-channel acoustic communication systems

Pierre M. Dumuid, Ben S. Cazzolato and Anthony C. Zander (2008)

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123 (1), January, p174-185, (Accepted 9 October 2007)
DOI: 10.1121/1.2804940

Abstract:

The application of inverse filter designs as a means of providing improved communication performance in acoustic environments is investigated. Tikhonov regularized inverse filters of channel transfer functions calculated in the frequency domain are used as a means of obtaining multi-channel filters. Three classifications of inverse filter structures have been considered using time-domain simulations. The performance of Tikhonov regularized inverse filters designed according to each of these classifications is compared with each other and against a filter design developed by Stojanovic [Stojanovic, M. (2005). Retrofocusing techniques for high rate acoustic communications, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 11731185]. It is shown that the filter design developed by Stojanovic requires less regularization and outperforms the Tikhonov regularized inverse filter designs when communicating over a single channel. While the filter developed by Stojanovic is designed to use multiple transmitters to transmit to a single receiver, the filter was implemented in a multi-channel system and proposed to have a focusing similar to that obtained using time-reversal. It was found that for the scenario used in the simulation, the Tikhonov regularized inverse design for full multi-channel inversion achieved better focusing than the design by Stojanovic, where simulation results show 20 dB less cross-talk at the expense of around 2 dB loss in signal strength.

This material is now only available to staff and students of the University of Adelaide.
Should you wish to receive a copy, please contact the AVC Group webmaster.
Note that if this article is under review, then it cannot be released and email requests will not be answered.

Published Document - NOT available for public access
Manuscript - available for public access